Bravatek Solutions Inc (BVTK)

[FullDeck]

Reverse Mergers and Money-Laundering

For anyone with a significant stake in BVTK, here's how reverse mergers often, not always, involve money laundering.

DarkPulse's O'Leary's recent DISCLOSURE of a supposed Non-DISCLOSURE Agreement to Reverse Merger with a public company raises some red flags here.

So just in case you believe O'Leary will actually do this with IHSI, you should be aware that the existing public company's shares (IHSI's) are usually reverse-split into being virtually worthless.

And with all of IHSI's debt and even Federal IRS tax liens against them, shareholders would almost certainly be wiped out.

Personally, I don't believe O'Leary has any intention of doing an RM with IHSI, nor do I believe DarkPulse is even a real legit business with real revenues (much less profits).

I believe BVTK just saw the negative exposure getting too hot, and they needed another shiny thing to divert attention from their real lack of substance and their shady activities.

And it's working... the bait has been taken.

But for any who care about the truth, the full article should be read, as money laundering takes many forms.

From the "Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists":

Here's the part involving reverse mergers, from ACAMS:

http://www.acams.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Over-the-Counter-Pink-Sheet-Securities-the-Threat-they-Pose-as-a-ML-Vehicle-to-BDs-H-Pleau.pdf


I personally suspect the laundering is being done via the toxic lenders, many of whom have clients with "questionable" funds they need to clean up.

BVTK, on its face, looks clean. Cellucci doesn't need to dirty his hands dealing with any KNOWN illicit funds, just accept toxic loans from "accredited" lenders, thus distancing himself from the dirty money.

"Hey, I just run a legit cyber-security company! We need a loan, we get a loan!"

Shades of Tony Soprano and the waste management business.

Meanwhile, the lenders convert loans to shares, the "pump" beats the drums, the converted shares get sold and the original "financiers" get scrubbed money back, minus a cut.

From YOU, the duped investor who bought your shares on the hype.

All the SAAs, the MAPs, the JVs... it's all the ABCs of PUMP.

The lenders get out, their clients get paid scrubbed money, and you're left wondering what happened.

But the PUMP is leaking bad when they resort to potential flimsy "Disclosed Non-Disclosure Agreements."

I think it's late in the game and the PUMP has almost run its course.

All just my HUMBLE opinion, of course.

Eyes open, all.