InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 213
Posts 6110
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/07/2015

Re: goldenisla post# 20736

Saturday, 03/10/2018 9:44:32 AM

Saturday, March 10, 2018 9:44:32 AM

Post# of 234946

So if the dosage was increased to meet the 70% efficacy in the mono trial because it might have been falling short.....



I appreciate Salt's information, thank you Salt. Hopefully he will respond to your question.

But I would think that even if the efficacy was 85%, they would increase the dose on the 15% rebounders. So, I don't know how much one can read into the dose modification vs hitting the 70%.


Now for the 70%, I would like to know if that is what the FDA is looking for to switch from investigatory (as Salt suggested) or if that goal was set because the phase 2 trail was around 70% and the want to increase that percentage?

A important note, it does not have to be 70% in the entire population. The just need to find a subset. I know in a previous CC the mentioned increasing the dose for a certain group (receptor count or something like that, I can't remember right off)... well maybe that group does not respond well and will not be included as responders. Maybe the efficacy is 90% for people with blood type O or whatever. That makes obtaining above 70% much easier and since they had around 70% for the entire population in the phase 2, I feel that have a very good chance of hitting that mark.


Primary Objective: Identify PRO 140 responders and increase responder rate above 70%





0.2075
-0.0035 (-1.66%)
Volume: 3,770,176
Day Range: 0.1925 - 0.218
Bid: 0.20
Ask: 0.215
Last Trade Time: 4:00:12 PM EDT
Total Trades: 312
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News