InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 15
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/28/2018

Re: wcopeland post# 1899

Friday, 03/09/2018 2:01:49 PM

Friday, March 09, 2018 2:01:49 PM

Post# of 2099
I imagine others will be also be second guessing the P3 trial protocol. I sure would liked to have seen VB-111 as a monotherapy verse Avastin alone in a head-to-head trial. Analysis of the full data when it’s available should be very revealing.

I went back to compare the Phase 2. It’s interesting to note the difference between the P2 and P3 trials. In the P2 trial all patients received VB-111 as monotherapy until disease progression at which point they were split between VB-111 with Avastin and Avastin alone. Could the extra doses of VB-111 while on monotherapy have made the difference?

wcopeland, I agree with you about Dror. I think he was very forthcoming about the results, in what must have been an extremely difficult situation. For us it has turned into a bad investment, but Dror has spent the better part of his career developing VB-111. This has got to be somewhat devastating for him. I also wonder what’s going to happen with their brand new drug manufacturing facility. It looked like such a good idea at the time. Now it almost looks like a white elephant. And what about all the recent additions to their headcount? Will they keep all those new employees?

I was hoping this stock was going to help my retirement, but there are others who were hoping it was going to help them live longer. Lots of disappointment all around.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VBLT News