InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 168
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2006

Re: Fishforbreakfast post# 115108

Tuesday, 10/10/2006 12:43:13 PM

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:43:13 PM

Post# of 311075
I really appreciate all the information you have been providing with your posts. But there is one thing that I don't understand. If someone had naked shorted the stock back when it was .40 or even later, why not just cover now at .12? They would still be in the money big time and would not be risking taking a bath when the stock starts its run, which even they must think is a good possibility to happen. Or am I missing some fundamental point?