Envirometal Technologies Inc. (EVLLF)

[teq0904]

Anyone is free to comment on this post however I may choose not to respond to it.

The “Wet Side” processing begins with the soak cycle. The fine ground powder from our (MWX) patent pending HMX-Mill is immersed into EnviroLeach’s patent pending solution, commonly known as the leach cycle, and is dissolved for a specified period. The EnviroLeach non-toxic solution is an application of inorganic electrochemistry and dissolves the metals into solution.
The above explains that MWX supplies the dry side and ETI does the wet - they decided the split should be 20/80 for mining and eWaste.

Anyone can call ETI management like I did but the above is clear since the first paragraph came from Mineworx.

Anyone who calls should consider the following in advance of the call, so they get a conclusive answer from ETI. -- ETI has 3 big miners at an advanced stage of negotiations after doing hundreds of tests, and Duane's video said one will be announced next month, and MWX is not entered at Disruptive Mining. Why would they do any of this if they didn't have mining rights to the chemical? If MWX was going to use the chemical in mining, why would they let ETI do 3 deals with the biggest miners? Why would the guy at the independent lab who verified the chemical works, quit his job to work for ETI if MWX had the rights?

I went over all that with ETI, and anyone else can too.