Thanks for the reply. Obviously, the p value in 9902A as a stand-alone measurement is not supportive, but IMO the hazard ratio, the 3.3-month median survival advantage, and the ~50% three-year survival advantage are. The p value of 0.33 could be construed as the result of what can go wrong in a small trial despite demonstrated efficacy.
Taken together with the fact that this trial was halted in mid-stream by the FDA and a few months later halted permanently by DNDN, I'm thinking that CBER will not look at 9902A as a negative. I'm definitely more confident of this view after getting a preview of the probable future advisory panel's impression of Provenge from the Feb 06 CTGT Advisory Committee minutes.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.