InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 35
Posts 7503
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2012

Re: Trustbaby post# 12809

Monday, 02/26/2018 1:03:39 AM

Monday, February 26, 2018 1:03:39 AM

Post# of 43716
It’s legal 101. Remove thyself from hypothesis.
Their sales are equal to the last 2 cvm rounds combined. The legal ramifications of cvm are negligible. In order to avoid such a notion execs were forced to execute these trades.

$50m cvm win doesn’t equal loss to these firms; any loss or gain stand alone....not on the premises of prior actions.

Ie. bob owns a company. Joe buys it. Joe says bob has to stay on 5 years. Bob says ok. Joe runs business counterintuitive to joe. Joe is the owner though. Joe tells bob he should do this and that. Bob says “no” you’ll fail doing so. Joe says “ I won, I bought you out bob”. Bob says “yes you bought me out. Why? Because you were bigger than me and you paid my asking price..... but, since you were bigger, why was i doing better Than you considering you are bigger? You see, I was doing it better. And you aren’t listening to me. Maybe, think for a moment, you didn’t buy me out; rather, I SOLD YOU!”


You all see? In an arena of egos....how either side could say they are dominant?
THis is perfect example of why market doesn’t always behave the way we expect.


Reality is always embedded...

I bought you out!!!
I convinced you to buy me!!

What’s reality?




Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CVM News