InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 2974
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/23/2017

Re: Spideyboy post# 10797

Thursday, 02/22/2018 10:24:20 AM

Thursday, February 22, 2018 10:24:20 AM

Post# of 44784
Hey Spidey,

If someone want to attempts to respond to my claims, should I just stay silent? Doesn't know but probably better funded was the argument wasn't it? My response backed up my argument that management is responsible for that side. Are all the top notch scientists responsible for that? No, management is. Did you read my post. 9 phase 3's. How are they executing their plan with precision. How are we failing so obviously compared to them.

The proverbial I'm "ok" with them is alarming to say the least. Just like you're "ok" with them. Just ignore how a comparative company who started 3 years after us, is so farther ahead because I might respond to them. Great argument not to respond. Seems to be the norm don't you think?

Just like your argument of CLI interim results. Just divide the timeline posted on clinicaltrials site in half, and that's the possibility. No comment on site enrolment miss by having 14 active sites instead of the goal of 40 by year end like they put out a news release on. Or is that the top notch scientists fault.

Just dismiss my posts because of how I come across. Wow. That's impressive. I'm sure Gary has endured more in his life and can take a little critique form another poster, and doesn't need you to run to his defence. But kudos for him to at least try, unlike you.