"Wow. Kind of sounds like two lepers arguing over who has the most fingers"
No it sounds like a shareholder offering verifiable information that TMBXF has good value to shareholders in contrast to your false claims of "a mining company without a mine"
"So TMBXF is good because MCPI is worse"
No just a comparison with some verifiable information on another junior mining company with a higher share price and market cap but based on my analysis TMBXF has much better shareholder value
"Alright, then. I was at least hoping for a bit of creativity -- Maybe a clue about what's planned, or some numbers"
I provided plenty of publicly verifiable information in support of my conclusions and numbers which include no debt with TMBXF and over $800K of convertible debt in the comparison company that could dilute shareholders 200%.
"I'll say it again: No mine; no revenues"
Saying it again doesn't make the previous false claims true, it just means that the publicly verifiable information that I have provided is being ignored to support a false predetermined conclusion of "a mining company without a mine"
"Questionable (and limited) claims."
I already definitively proved the claims are paid up and are promising for deep copper based on ZTEM and adjacent property
"And the Eurogas deal? That's been flogged for years, with no results. Is that still real?"
Eurogas is pursuing the case against Slovakia in world court and TMBXF has 20% and 26% interests in Eurogas and any world court settlement.
" Balance sheets don't (or shouldn't) lie. "
Interesting, that type of information is what I have relied on to draw any conclusions about TMBXF or comparisons
"If this is the best a company shill can produce . . . I'm disappointed."
I'm disappointed that this has degraded to name calling since my facts are verifiable and can't be refuted. Then again if the facts don't back up one's conclusion then some choices are to revise the conclusion, remain quiet and hope no one notices, or to double down with false information and name calling. For what it's worth I'm a shareholder not a company shill.
"I should've known better than to come here looking for market color."
That's interesting. I've provided plenty of information (color commentary) that provides good insight to TMBXF and can be readily verified.
" I was kind of hopeful when I saw the volume pop, but that's likely an insider unloading, and we'll only hear about later"
That's a bad assumption in terms of the trading volume. Insiders know the value better than me. I suspect it is someone shorting and indeed we will find out about that later as I suspect that may carry a large risk of being badly burned.
". I'm out. Good luck to you."
And to you as well. Feel free to return if you want further clarification on the information I posted or if there is other information of interest to TMBXF shareholders. I'm sure we all want the most complete and accurate information available.
Jacob J. Rosenblum on what every lawyer knows.
“If the facts are against you, hammer the law. If the law is against you, hammer the facts. If the fact and the law are against you, hammer opposing counsel."
