Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[Dutch1]

Could it be that during the process of reaching a settlement, legal steps have been taken, that might help GERS winning the appeal? Also could it be the settlement discussions where more or less 'advised' by the judge, and they first had to show they did try that road? And now they can show that the defendants where more then happy to settle (which might weaken their position) but the amount of money offered was way too low? Don't forget that the defendants seem to have changed their opinion on their websites and in other disclaimers when it comes to the usage of the technology.
Maybe these settlement discussions after all have served the process, and just maybe they have been planned to go this way?