InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 1134
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2016

Re: Aqua-FX post# 23191

Monday, 02/19/2018 5:06:01 PM

Monday, February 19, 2018 5:06:01 PM

Post# of 47671
Not sure I understand the significance of this, if there is a typo or if I am interpreting it correctly?

Dent said Mexus wasn't providing anymore labor or finances so that would imply Mexus was covering costs and not MarMar.



First, does that mean Mexus isn't providing labor and finances in a physical sense or that they aren't providing shareholders with information about labor and finance costs?

If it is the former and MarMar is truly covering the cost why would Mexus have anything to report? And why would that infer Mexus is carrying the cost?

If it is the latter and they are "going dark" that is a huge red flag.