Denial of service? LMBO.
Should I not respond to an attempt to discredit to say we have a monopoly when we clearly don't. When a poster keeps coming back with other made up facts, should I not respond to show the errors, in fear that I am posting too much?
What engagement of responses to the many questions brought up are you talking about. The only ones who don't respond are the ones that are in denial to what this company is really about.
Have I heard responses of the true risks of this company? Nope. Just "there are risks"
Have I heard responses to the questionable resumes of management and board? Nope
Have I heard responses to Zami's gaff of saying we made most milestones? Nope.
Have I heard any responses to our manufacturing edge that has been lost over the years? Only one attempt that was shot down.
Have I heard responses to the fact that we have NO statistically evident data in any human trial. We are a phase 1 company jumping to phase 3. That's why investors don't care that we are a phase 3 company. And that's why that question of show me another company in Phase 3 bears no point. Edison report clearly stated that in the risks. And again, nope.
So the only ones who aren't engaging are the believers in this company. It's pretty obvious why, as there's little to no argument. But when people try to state otherwise, I will bring up evidence that backs up MY argument.
And as far as the TOS in this board. Who gets their posts deleted pretty much every day, and we may get an edited version of it later. Please don't call the kettle back. Please engage in the arguments. Maybe your posts will be seen by everyone.
Just keep hoping we will go away right. Perfect examples of my argument in the posts this morning don't you think? Yes just skip over as one suggests.
And even Pluristem took the mention of Petri dishes off their presentations finally. Wonder why.
