Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. (IPCI)

[doogdilinger]

Samsa has all but told us he is not going to seek monetary damages but is instead going to be seeking a commitment from IPCI mgmt. for a more transparent approach to market. Samsa also hinted about getting mgmt. to get serious about looking into the manipulators and shorts by pulling the blue sheets.

Of course that's just my take on all the clues/hints Samsa has provided this board over the past several months...only Samsa knows his true objective(s) though...so we shall wait to see how it all plays out.

Of interesting note though...the lawyer firm listed in November 2017 doesn't even list Intellpharmaceutics on its website of current cases?

Maybe that's because the case is so tiny...or maybe it's because a settlement is already being agreed to?

Far smarter legal minds than me will have to weigh in but the link to the attorney firm I just posted doesn't list IPCI anywhere in their list of active cases.

Samsa
Friday, 10/13/17 08:35:00 AM
Re: doogdilinger post# 30609
0
Post # of 32797

Doog, lets just say depending on which case is chosen that will all be taken care of. LOL. I know people have their own views regarding the cases. as I stated, it is irrelevant. once someone filed it was a done a deal. so who would you rather have driving the bus? someone who really doesn't care nor understand the company or someone who does?

to hopefully alleviate wimike, how it can be beneficial to shareholders. especially during time of negotiations. Now think about this. if you were sitting across the table from them what would you ask for???? There is more to life than just money. the quicker things settle the less expensive they are. just think about that once. what would you ask for? LOL

And doog, that disclaimer you pointed too in a previous post, lets just say is not enforceable. So yes, there was a reason I did not want people to know I was going for lead and there is a reason I want it and yes, whether you agree or not is fine but I am on the side of the shareholder in this one. Trust me, I own over 100k shares. I have a lot at stake myself.

Samsa
Friday, 10/13/17 11:02:44 AM
Re: tilator post# 30617
0
Post # of 32797

Tilator, again, all I can say is, whether we agreed or disagreed that a case should be filed, is irrelevant. One had been filed the day after the adcomm disaster. at which point, who do you want driving the bus? someone sympathetic to IPCI or someone who doesn't give a crap? as to how you can be assured that I would look out for shareholders interest, as I said. I own over 100k shares. Do you think I would do something counter productive to my own interests?

I can not go into further legal discussions as to the merits or strategy that will be employed. You can either believe me or not. at this point we do not even know who will be certified as lead. But, feel free to go back through the years and read my posts and make your own determination as to my intentions with the company. I can tell you that I have been a shareholder since 2012. I know the company inside and out and with the shares I own, I have a considerable vested interest. I have a substantial legal background myself and lets just say I used my political connections to locate one of the top firms in the country at very advantageous terms.

So, personally, I have not seen your ID show up on this board until recently. I could question your intentions. But I don't. why? because it is irrelevant. just like in this case. keep in mind a case was already filed. that bus had already left the station. at least with me as a driver, you know what you are getting. Hopefully that allays some of your concerns.