But Burstein himself has been a basher to them , so how could they in good faith send it to him.
I'm not sure how you define "basher". Burstein has been honest and fair when reporting about this company. The fact that he has only had bad things to say so far simply means that the company hasn't given him anything good to work with.
What better way to improve their reputation than to provide the industry's best known pundit with proof that they have a working product? Rather than provide the test results and remove all doubt, they refused to provide any substantiating info and increase Burstein's level of distrust.
It just makes no sense.
Also, I resent the fact that you called me a shameless pumper, there is no need to resort to personal attacks (as I dont do that to you).
Well, you did try to somehow twist my comments about the growing market into some kind of deal with Alcatel. Anyway, my use of the word "pumper" is not worse than your use of the word "basher".