InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 3197
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/09/2006

Re: Good Sport post# 11417

Thursday, 02/15/2018 12:47:06 PM

Thursday, February 15, 2018 12:47:06 PM

Post# of 18587
It is next to impossible to place blame on our newest CEO but also understand my view involving the CEO prior, and with that he wasn't being paid a nickel so I can't really blame him either.

The share structure sucks but is doable provided that we have excellent Management and direct- constant income from NEO due to licensing as we had thought but when we easily look back at our past I just see that HDC management has ALWAYS been our stake in the heart.

I am as said prior not knowledgeable with the in depth of our patents but feel as though our patents mean very little as to real income. I feel as though the rest of the world has found newer incorporated ways around us and many of our patents have expired. I KNOW it is safe to say HDC has NOT maintained patent(s) maintenance fees <--- my personal view.

Who or what within this company knows anything about the fine interactions and mixes of our patents? Who has ANY ability to sell/lease licensing of our patents? I don't want to hear jack sh.t about our patent attorneys simply (as I said years ago) because our management and or our patent attorneys were not in tune to the trouble brewing with the Intel patent to start with. I mentioned years ago that I thought this problem stated during the employment of Mr. Tobin. It seems Barnhill and Mr. Tobin were at each others throat. I have always thought without proof that blame was shifted at Mr. Tobins but the deep seated problem was never found. Sure later the suit about slander but what was the main problem generated from? was it a mistake involving the Intel/HDC patent.