News Focus
News Focus
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biopearl post# 1138

Saturday, 10/07/2006 4:14:50 PM

Saturday, October 07, 2006 4:14:50 PM

Post# of 19309
Hostile takeover not likely:

>What stops the acquisition of GTCB at these low prices? Are we "protected" in some way?<

Hostile takeovers in biotech almost never happen. Biotech firms typically posses a lot of “human capital” (e.g. Dr. Harry Meade) and people can simply walk after a buyout. Thus, prospective suitors would be taking a huge risk in trying to pull off a hostile takeover; if they succeeded, they might end up with a pharm and a lab with no one who knows how to run them.

Massachusetts corporate statutes provide additional shareholder protection from a hostile takeover. This is not to say that a hostile takeover can’t possibly happen, but it’s very low on the list of things a GTC investor should be concerned about, IMO.

>And was this the reference to the 19.9% regarding recent structure of deal with LFB?<

19.9% is a standard equity stake for a strategic partner to take in a not-yet-profitable enterprise. The reason is that a 20% stake triggers pro rata accounting of profits and losses on the holder’s own income statement. I.e., if LFB were to acquire 20% of GTC instead of 19.9%, they would have to record 20% of GTC’s operating losses on LFB’s own income statement, which would reduce LFB’s reported profitability. Regards, Dew

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today