Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[Protector]

goecappy, yes.

Because the stand still agreement apparently wanted to avoid just that. Neither party can do a Lawsuit or incite some other party to do so, against the other.

Yet WE retail shareholders were NOT included in the stand-still agreement. It was between a SELECT CLUB (ex Bod + PPHM and RONIN & Cie).

And furthermore it MUST be presented in such way that their is LIABILITY for the Current Bod and CEO too because the BoD has been playing Hide & Seek and the CEO has been communicating in deceptive ways in my opinion.

So it must be broken open and actually may be better in a way were a .gov (SEC, FDA, etc ) investigates rather then a class action. What is going on is IMO cause to believe their is FRAUD.

It shows from the fact that:

- The declarations of the BoD (incl. those in 2017) are NOT in line with the sales to Oncology (International) Inc.

- The party Oncology (International) Inc is unreachable TOTALLY, just try to find them).

- There are GOOD indications in the 6 months for 8 Mil$ UP-FRONT (which is no UP-FRONT) that Oncology is acting in a back-to-back deal of ONE or MULTIPLE companies in a line that will at some point leverage the PPHM PtdSer R&D and IP.

- The 'tailor made' creation of Oncology and the fact that this was done just before the current CEO claims no interest and no single party will take it all, shows a set-up. The presence or not presence of funding of Oncology at the moment that the contract with CDMO/PPHM was signed will show if the current BoD and CEO have done the needed D&D on this case.

- The terms of the contract are needed to see if ways of LOWERING our Commercial Fee are possible by shifting the profits to other places the Oncology Inc because Oncology Inc (privately hold) made bad agreements after which PPHM/CDMO can hide saying it isn't there fault. Well it is, they should have made stipulation relating to the revenue generation path and return of assets in case of failure.

- Where is CEO King's severance contarct (promised but certainly not timely disclosed as promised).

- We need prove of how BP's were contacted and what was said to them so that we can see that they rely ALL (at least GILD, ROCHE, MERCK, BMY, JNJ and NOVARTIS, etc) said what the CEO claims.

- We NEED to know WHAT happened in FARGO, what ex BOD/King new about that and if the berried it hoping the dose switching would pass.

So ONE ENTRY point is needed for FRAUD so that is becomes a criminal investigation IMO.

And we must make sure NOBODY tries to HI-JACK the Lawsuit (by a fake lawsuit that they control) because the class action in the past, IMO, might have been such cases.

So CRIMINAL vs Class Action.


AIMO