Home > Boards > Free Zone > User's Groups > The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Republicans, Deficits and the Two-Santa Theory

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
BullNBear52 Member Profile
Member Level 
Followed By 114
Posts 187,073
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 12/16/02
160x600 placeholder
Wheat Climbs on Indications of Tighter Supply -- Daily Grain Highlights
By Kirk Maltais
Front Month Nymex Natural Gas Rose 0.69% This Week to Settle at $5.1400 -- Data Talk
Front Month Nymex RBOB Gasoline Rose 0.75% This Week to Settle at $2.1875 -- Data Talk
Top Company News of the Day
Costco On Pace for Record High Close -- Data Talk
United Airlines Fined $1.9 Million for Violating Transportation Department's Tarmac-Delay Rule
California Attorney General Appeals Purdue Pharma's Sackler Settlement
2Q GDP Still Seen +6.6% -- Data Week Ahead
Italy to Launch Three New Government Bonds in 4Q
DAX Ends the Week 0.27% Higher at 15531.75 -- Data Talk
CAC 40 Index Ends the Week 1.04% Higher at 6638.46 -- Data Talk
STOXX Europe 50 Index Ends the Week 0.82% Higher at 3550.35 -- Data Talk
EURO STOXX 50 Index Ends the Week 0.67% Higher at 4158.51 -- Data Talk
STOXX Europe 600 Index Ends the Week 0.31% Higher at 463.29 -- Data Talk
FTSE 100 Index Ends the Week 1.26% Higher at 7051.48 -- Data Talk
Nike Down After Revenue Miss, Supply Chain Issues
Kansas City Fed Services Activity Index Slips But Stays Positive in September
VC Daily: Question: What to Make of Efforts in Congress to Lower Drug Prices?
Turkish Lira Falls Near Record Lows After Rate Cut; Norges Bank Raises Rates; Purchasing Managers Point to Slowing in U.S. and Europe
U.S. New Home Sales Rose in August
Rite Aid Expands Partnership With Uber
Salesforce.com on Track for Record High Close -- Data Talk
Nike Down Over 6%, on Pace For Largest Percent Decrease Since June 2020 -- Data Talk
Walgreens Rolls Out More Pfizer Booster Shots
Moderna to Supply Covid-19 Vaccine Doses in Peru
Petrofac Shares Rise on Guilty Plea to Seven Counts of Bribery
WPP to Pay $19 Million to Resolve SEC Charges of Anti-Bribery, Accounting Provisions
Belgium Business Confidence Falls in September
Fed's Mester On Board With November Taper, 2022 Rate Rise
FTSE Falls, Retail Sales Slow as Pandemic, Brexit Weigh
BullNBear52 Member Level  Saturday, 02/10/18 01:14:20 PM
Re: None
Post # of 1117 
Republicans, Deficits and the Two-Santa Theory
If you think budget shortfalls violate conservative economic principles, you've forgotten Reaganomics.
By Karl W. Smith
February 9, 2018, 12:20 PM EST

With his signing of a budget deal Friday morning, a Republican president has now joined forces with a Republican-controlled Congress to increase the projected 2019 deficit from $710 billion to $1.15 trillion. And that's in just two months, the time it took to add spending increases to the effect of the $1.5 trillion tax overhaul enacted in January.

It's hard to miss the contrast to the Republican fiscal hawkishness that was on display in 2010, when House Speaker John Boehner negotiated a series of budget compromises with President Barack Obama. For today's Republicans, the appeal of tax cuts and military spending trumps everything. In Boehner's day, Republicans argued that the deficit was an existential threat, and that shutting down the government was a painful necessity if it meant preventing the deficit from spiraling out of control.

Naturally, the change of tune has produced accusations of hypocrisy. Senator Rand Paul, the libertarian-minded Kentucky Republican, took to the Senate floor to complain that his party keeps faith with its conservative identity only when it's out of power. He wasn't completely wrong. But the whole truth is more complicated. The Republican rift over austerity runs deep.

In March of 1976, The National Observer published an article by the conservative thinker Jude Wanniski entitled, "Taxes and the Two-Santa Theory" that argued that Republican fiscal policy had gone dangerously astray.

The GOP had committed itself to a program of permanent austerity, Wanniski observed, meaning that in good times Republicans wanted to raise taxes to ward off inflation while in bad times Republicans wanted to cut spending to balance the budget. In contrast, he argued, Democrats had the political sense to play Santa, offering the economy increased spending whenever they could and paying for it with higher taxes when the bill came due.

Wanniski thought that a triumph of the Democratic Santa would harm the economy, as rising taxes dampened incentives for entrepreneurship and choked off the capital that businesses need to expand.

What the economy required, he wrote, was two Santas: a Democratic one to deliver the gift of government spending, and a Republican one to hand out tax cuts. The addition of the tax-cutting Santa would unleash private enterprise, expand the business sector and dampen the demand for social services, Wanniski thought.

Notice that Wanniski wasn't especially fearful of deficits. He hinted that it was the absence of the tax-cutting Santa that tended to push deficits higher anyway. First, the permanent austerity demanded by the GOP meant that Americans could only receive a bit of succor from the spending delivered by the Democrats. So naturally, they demanded ever more of it. Second, the resulting high tax rates constrained business formation so much that revenues were actually lower than they would be if rates were cut.

The two-Santa theory became the political complement to supply-side economics, a phrase also popularized by Wanniski, and formed the basis of the fiscal policies of the Ronald Reagan presidency, when taxes were cut and spending was increased. Contrary to Wanniski’s predictions, the budget deficit surged. The economy, however, turned a corner. It went from low growth and high inflation in 1980 to high growth and low inflation by 1987.

Reagan’s popularity elevated the status of the supply-siders and their two-Santa theory. For two decades, the Republican austerity impulse was contained. The financial crisis in 2008 and popular rage over the accompanying bailouts revived it. The Tea Party seemed to be the hope for the Republican future, and the party leadership was swept away by calls for fiscal restraint.

Their hearts, though, were never really in it. After all, this was the party that, under President George W. Bush, cut taxes during a time of war and expanded benefits under Medicare, the largest U.S. entitlement program.

Deep down, they still believed in Reaganomics. Now that a Republican is in the White House and the Tea Party has faded from prominence, the two-Santa theory prevails again.



Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
Current Price
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences