DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[stakddek]

OhioBuckeye: Attempts at besmirching the company rarely warrant an e-mail to confirm what is evident from the content of the post, and the reputation of the poster. I don't think it's necessary to question the company on every bit of negative propaganda that we come across. If it would make you feel more comfortable, please contact DNAP via e-mail or telephone and ask the question. Perhaps if phrased as the poster doubloon put it, "2 or 3 holders of 60% of the float are ..." you may get a no. Or a no comment. But please don't put my name with the question. I feel the matter is a ploy and any further attention to it is furthering the ploy.

This is still penny stock land and some people believe that by posting rumors they may be able, or are able to effect the price of the stock targeted. Ask yourself, is the source credible, and is the material postulated credible? A simple reflection on the statement "2 or 3 who own 60% of the float" is the answer to your question.

Stakddek