Of course... Three companies. GERS, BTZO, FCC. Today is Feb 3. And time of post is only four seconds past 3.33. Not bad for a Tulip land investor.
One point of possibility to the division of any legal windfalls stemming from the legal situation. That being, ownership/% placement really is not accurate just based on %.
KK is in the drivers seat. IF, i-f, if any money flows in the direction of the three entities based on the infringing companies having to pay, would by definition of logic, mainly benefit GERS and thus their shareholders. Why? Because I'm about 99.999% 'sure' (nine is based on 3) 'positive' 'absolute' (3) that the deal will involve future royalty payments to GERS and it's technology.
As for the other companies, the money'(s) involved both in future rev from GERS and whatever it is BTZO sells, plus whatever FCC does, would probably be put to work paying off debts and furthering the business models of each respective company.
It really does not matter how much money any of the companies receive, only the P/E ratio, the profit-to-debt ration, the revenue source/stream. All investors stand to profit but KK for sure will (could) laugh all the way to whatever bank he chooses to buy. Maybe buy his bitcoin enterprise or whatever it is that goes through KK's mind.
Of course, just an opinion of mine.
AI
