Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[drumming4life]

And the key part of the Nov 20th statement is "the PTAB held that Apple did not show by a preponderance of the evidence that the asserted claims of the '815 and '005 patents were unpatentable."

Note they said, "APPLE DID NOT SHOW BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE", which means that the PTAB made their judgement based on evidence presented in the trial.

Nowhere does it say that Voip-Pal cheated because they had open communication with the board and swayed the board to rule in Voip-Pal's favor. The BOARD made the decision by THE SOUND ARGUMENTS AND PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE PATENT OWNER.

Am I missing something here?