InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,595.76
(
0.75%
)
US TECH 100
18,940.40
(
1.04%
)
Dow Jones
41,096.77
(
0.58%
)
Brent Oil
72.02
(
0.06%
)
Bitcoin
58,042.80
(
-0.16%
)
Post# of 31087
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

robtewms

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 40
Posts 5812
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/24/2006

robtewms

Re: Malone post# 18544

Saturday, 01/27/2018 8:38:07 PM

Saturday, January 27, 2018 8:38:07 PM

Post# of 31087
The S-1/A version 2 increased from 4,000,000 shares to 5,842,404 shares. In case, anyone is wondering what's different between the versions.

Also, the filing suggests TMPS will low ball Customer B to force them to take TMPS to court. TMPS doesn't have the deposit to pay Customer B. Else, they would just pay Customer B $750,000 per contractual agreement. And, that's going to make new customers quite comfortable entering into a new contracts with TMPS since court proceedings are public record.

Yeah. This could be a be settled quickly if TMPS could pay Customer B in TMPS shares. Wonder if they'll go for it.

It's called a confidence game. Why? Because you give me your confidence? No. Because I give you mine. -House of Games (1987)

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up