Rambus (RMBS)

[treowth]

Rhetorical question? Well, no.

Thank you for your response. I have posted the same question on four boards, and you are the only poster to make an effort to respond in full - thank you. (Empiricum, made a thoughtful, partial response.)

As RMBS has a 4.25% in hand on DDR1, it is within the realm of possible that they will land a similar judgment at Samsung's expense in the court of the HJW. Perhaps, RMBS will be equally successful against MU?

Take the FTC out of the ultimate equation, play the entire deck and run the table on DDR1 - through appeals if necessary. Don't bother settling for less than 3.5% for DDR1. License DDR1 progeny on the same basis. Heck, we have waited 6 years, what's another 3-4?

I see risk in what we refer to as the AT trial of nominal damages or at least offsets.

JMHO.