InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 517
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/29/2016

Re: georgeiporgi post# 1686

Tuesday, 01/23/2018 6:39:52 PM

Tuesday, January 23, 2018 6:39:52 PM

Post# of 2842
There are a number of huffy puffy shareholders, like hdoggydingdong and akecp, threatening to sue certain ecpn board members. I encourage them to do this but I have seen no sign they have the backbone to get recompense from the people who royally screwed them with lies.

However, I think the threats (even the empty ones) to demand a pound of flesh for the gross financial damage caused by ecpn BOD is having an effect on the new BOD members hence the current dissidence on the BOD leading to the delay in the 10K release.

So you may wonder, are the old board members not worried by the shareholders threats? Nah, CM is about done and will prolly be recused from testifying due to medical imperatives. If he gets to testify he will provide an entertaining testimony about nano-gremilns eating and ferting out the PMs into the air.

Stumbleton will claim total ignorance of the technical aspects and claim he was merely following advice of his “experts”, chuckiepoo and charlatan Davidson. Davidson will present assay results from labs saying he relied on these.

And what about Smith? He will say that his work relied completely on assays given to him by ecpn and he recommended that 3rd party verification be done. Testimony will likely go like this:

Judge: Mr. Smith, was this 3rd party verification done?

Smith: not to my knowledge.

Judge: Mr Smith, were you aware of all these negative assays?

Smith: No, these nil assays were not shown to me.
Judge: Mr. Smith, during your surface sampling program, were any of the samples not touched by handy randy?

Smith: He was in charge of the samples from collection to shipping.
Judge: Would handy randy have had an opportunity to add inquart to the samples?
Smith: He was in charge of the samples from collection to shipping.

And how will chuckiepoo testify?

Judge: When you received the numerous nil assays why did you not question the high values reported from a few select samples?
Chuckie: well gee we knew that there were these dang nano-gremlins messing with the PMs, so obviously the nil assays were caused by them eating and ferting the PMs into the air. The truth of this came to me in a dream. And besides I knew them gremlins were there cause they used ta crawl up my pant legs and make my balls itch.

Judge: Ahhhhh, do you have any scientific evidence to back up these claims?

Chuckie: Yes I sure do, have a close look at this rash on my two huevos.

And stumbleton?

Judge: As CEO you were in charge of assuring that PRs were as near to the truth as could be ascertained. How do you explain the world class errors in virtually all the ecpn PRs since you took over as CEO.

Stumble: Well, gol darn it, I was just putting out what my superduper experts like charlatan davidson and chuckiepoo told me.

Judge: Why did you not take into account the many nil assays and the fact that all the mining industry experts that looked at el cap reported their were nil PMs?
Stumble: As chukie said the nano-gremlins ate the PMs and crawled up his pants. Those industry exerts don’t hold a candle to my team of experts.
Judge: On what basis did you judge your team of totally unqualified “experts” to know more about PMs than industry experts who have spend their whole careers studying real PMs?
Stumble: becuz they are mi mates and they lie even better than I do.