Funny, there is no shorts argument in Treaty and the fab 5 defense. They never presented a iota of evidence that there are naked sort sales still uncovered, to the contrary there are solid undisputable evidence that no such shorts exists according to FINRA & SEC. So why would someone bother covering naked shares that all the official records state are non existent ?
i think this one will be very easy for the judge to decide.
No short squeeze ahead cuz there ain't no naked short sales.
If there was such proof of the beginning of the existence of naked short sales in TECO, Klein, even if below average attorney, would have recognized it and would have presented it as part of the fab 5 defense.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.