InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 2974
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/23/2017

Re: bluehorsesho post# 9700

Friday, 01/19/2018 8:34:13 PM

Friday, January 19, 2018 8:34:13 PM

Post# of 44784
Balanced? Believe it or not I have tried to be. Just hard to try and be positive in any way when it comes to the inept twins. I can honestly say I never though I would become so negative on this company. To continually point out their many flaws is quite contradictory to having long skin in this game, but enough is enough. They need to go. But them gifting themselves 4% of the company, only strengthens their chance to remain unfortunately. This is why board did this imo. Ensures their seats are safe too.

As for CHA, I don't know what to think. They have seen a recent run of late, so possibly just taking advantage of that. CHA seems exactly like UT. Just say nothing except the token couple paragraphs in every report, then the hammer falls.

I haven't had the time to take a look into this SK treatment. Only see that they are in phase 2 trials. I still believe in our treatment, because of the male female thing. We have been at quite the disadvantage over others having 50/50 male female ratio. Others got their numbers with total males or very skewed numbers for males. We were 100% successful with males.

We truly need a partnership or a big influx of cash from somewhere other than dilution. The oncology news was big, and shows the broad scope of indications we could take a stab at. Getting the cash risk off the table would do wonders for this stock. Should have been done long ago, like many others have.