InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1471
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2017

Re: stockinvestor01 post# 88624

Thursday, 01/18/2018 11:13:07 AM

Thursday, January 18, 2018 11:13:07 AM

Post# of 143078
Interesting bdci actually had revenues and a real company prior to the EXAD merger. So if now BDCI no longer has tee shirt apparel business then this is worst than I thought. Dwyer was able to pull off keeping an actual revenue prodimucong business private. If BDCI is clean then an actual merger accomplishes nothing. 0+0=0. It just gives the appearance of something simce the PPS is higher. Besides BDCI has an supposedly a reporting issue that prevents from being uplisted on the OTC markets. That was the alleged reason for the previous merger with EXAD. Really a shell game here. So merger or not all thats here is hopes the MJ play pulls thru with in itself is not clear. They supposed to be investing in private MJ companies and not has direct ownership. I'd say one thing is clear. Matt is a master at having folks fall for his focus pocus.