InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 73
Posts 4045
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/29/2008

Re: None

Sunday, 01/14/2018 1:17:33 PM

Sunday, January 14, 2018 1:17:33 PM

Post# of 326338
Edited To Add:

On January 10, 2018 NM, LLC Tweeted this link. Some might consider it a "coincidence" that NM, LLC should offer up a tweet pertaining to applications which "allegedly" do not pertain to them or their patent portfolio. Would any iHubber care to offer up an explanation as to why this deliberate mention of Voice apps would suddenly become part of their Social agenda?

https://martechtoday.com/alexa-will-voice-impact-mobile-marketing-208766/amp?__twitter_impression=true

I can certainly share my personal thoughts:

"Because as I have been spewing incessantly, their patents cover ALL MACHINE-READABLE INPUTS." Also, in business there are NO coincidences...JMO. In my personal view, anyone believing for one moment that YA was prepared to auction off Neom's core patents for a mere $3M DOES NOT understand business. Anyone believing that YA has not been planning a r/m (and associated r/s) fails to understand the extreme tax advantages of doing so.

While I will not purchase a single share until we witness our first bit of news (and I STRONGLY suggest everyone here do the same given YA's notorious repetitious abusive history), I firmly believe that the longer this has taken, the closer we are to success.

Edited To Add:
For the record, ever since Neom's June , 2016 filing I have questioned whether YA calling the debt and assuming control of Neom was the "Change In Control" Iain McCready had specifically negotiated with YA and incorporated into his employment contract, prior to accepting his CEO position. As I recall, his contract included this specific clause which was to pay him up to approx $2M depending upon the associated value of such a change in control.

All, and I do mean ALL, of the above, is merely one man's opinion.

Best,
Be Confident