Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[rekcusdo]

The case is not challenging the very law.

We have had primarily cases challenging the NWS. The NWS is NOT a part of HERA.

You want to lump them in together, but they are not together. If we sue based on the NWS, the judge can't then rule on the constitutionality of HERA just because it is HERA that made the NWS allowed.

And furthermore, the only cases that HAVE been brought challenging HERA have either a.) asked for a remedy of ending the NWS, which is not an appropriate remedy if challenging HERA or b.) have been brought by people without standing to bring the claims being brought.

So no...I don't agree with your assessment that it is the judges job to rule on something not in front of them.