InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 5233
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/02/2011

Re: investorpro1 post# 45294

Sunday, 01/07/2018 7:43:09 AM

Sunday, January 07, 2018 7:43:09 AM

Post# of 52840
That’s true however, IMO like I said the problems with BTZO isn’t the growth potential, but more the issue that BTZO will not be named probably in the court documents or in the PR. Also the gravity of planet 0.0001 is keeping BTZO down, where GERS seems to move without the gravity.
And there are so many shares available, it seems that not everybody shares the same interest.

That makes it a bit more of a gamble.
You’re right about the numbers you use.
However it might be it’s easier to buy $1000 worth of GERS at 0.15 (that would probably be near the highest bid at this time), which 5 times higher needs to bring it to .75
And a $1000 worth of BTZO at 0.0001 is pritty hard to get ( there are many more on ask, so you would be back in line). That would make it more realistic to buy BTZO at 0.0002. Which 5 times higher would bring it to 0.001. And that’s less harder to reach.
I don’t know what would happen sooner. 0.001 @ BTZO or 0.75 at GERS.