Yeah, I'm all ready for the rollover. PPS is completely 100% irrelevant now. I've gotten a ton of advice over the years regarding EPGL as well as others. I started my DD of EPGL going private when they first brought up the notion. I also talked to numerous big time players, hedgies, VC's about what they thought. All of them pretty much said the same things.
Among the plethora of gems that they all said…..one was that they wouldn't invest any money in any private company that wasn't going to make them a ton of money down the road. That it would have to have overwhelming odds for success. InWith has the goods. Its the most obvious thing on earth. The patents…with more to come...and the deal to get the marketable product prototype up. Its obvious that the VC's have seen all of EPGL's tech, patented and pending, and believe in the company.
As for my own experience, you need to know the head of the snake. Meaning you need to know the VC's intentions. Are they in it for the long term and will see things through. Hayes only went with VC's who are willing to see things through to the IPO or buyout and thats huge. Hence why it took longer then anticipated. That type of commitment from VC's comes with more risk and a longer timetable for them to make money, so they get a better deal. Which means the common investors don't get everything they want. i.e. a lucrative cash-out option. Its a 'give-take' scenario. But in the end, the common investor will still come out a winner, should the overwhelming odds for success come to fruition.
Knowledge is power. Go InWith Corp! Locked and loaded.
