InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 2515
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/29/2013

Re: jog49 post# 443559

Tuesday, 01/02/2018 11:31:51 PM

Tuesday, January 02, 2018 11:31:51 PM

Post# of 794686
Now THAT is an interesting point! I never thought of that but of course, as the supposed "fiduciary", the gvt, after becoming conservator, would be interested in acquiring cheap warrants, but the fiduciary role would prevent them from doing so. That is, if the gvt actually acted as a fiduciary. It did not ever do so. No equity holder would submit himself to such dilution and at such an incredibly low strike price.