Do we know who really owns Eyetalk? Maybe the ultimate plan was to drive REVO to the Grey Market. Then, subsequently establish Eyetalk, thereby making it possible to suck funds through the backend via Eyetalk365. The key is who owns Eyetalk. So, hopefully, the SEC is looking at this from the angle of the aforementioned scenario, or something thereto. With patent infringement cases being won by REVO/Eyetalk, one must assume as a result, money is flowing into someone's pockets. If this whole thing was, and is a scam, then it's incumbent upon the SEC to do it's job and bring this mess to an overdue end.