| Followers | 120 |
| Posts | 15115 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 08/31/2006 |
Sunday, October 01, 2006 6:37:33 PM
Where to start, first, I'm only defending the fact that they prob. had a standard web designer make their site. I don't have an axe to grind, but I lean towards liking rim.
Oh and they prob. didn't try to "cover" the picture, just trying to make it look feasible to it's application.
Also, these programs don't have trademarked logos, just standard pics, uncopywrited, for general use. Rim would have pulled down their own logo to a new layer, skewed it, then bam, you've got a pic.
With the resolution in some of their pics, if anyone was trying to fool you it would have been easily done, since the pixel count is so low.
Oh, and my loss of credibility doesn't bother me, I've got a stock that I'm eating crap on too, so I see why you guys are so aggressive in bashing it and any of its remote supporters, no harm no foul.
![](http://")
http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/27/gorimve2.jpg
Oh and they prob. didn't try to "cover" the picture, just trying to make it look feasible to it's application.
Also, these programs don't have trademarked logos, just standard pics, uncopywrited, for general use. Rim would have pulled down their own logo to a new layer, skewed it, then bam, you've got a pic.
With the resolution in some of their pics, if anyone was trying to fool you it would have been easily done, since the pixel count is so low.
Oh, and my loss of credibility doesn't bother me, I've got a stock that I'm eating crap on too, so I see why you guys are so aggressive in bashing it and any of its remote supporters, no harm no foul.
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
