![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Sunday, October 01, 2006 6:09:22 PM
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but since you asked, I have sent two pm's to Electick. I think I've probably sent more pm's to you than to him.
And, I think you missed the entire point of the post. While you believe strongly in your opinion, it's still only that - your theory.
What if, WB did call in the feds? You think it was done to keep the price artificially low. What if it was done because he took his fiduciary responsibility seriously and didn't think the decisions SEO was making were fair to shareholders? What if he did it to protect those of us who don't have millions of shares?
I'm not saying I believe that to be the case. But, it is the other extreme of the theory you posted.
My point was that none of us know what transpired between the two and, my opinion, is that the reality probably fell somewhere in the middle of these two extremes.
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM