InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 980
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/28/2014

Re: A deleted message

Friday, 12/15/2017 4:16:43 PM

Friday, December 15, 2017 4:16:43 PM

Post# of 129878
The PTAB is only one door to close. Vringo won at the PTAB - Won at the District! But lost at the Appeal over 101 ALICE!

"Congress created the CBM program, limited it to “covered business method patents,” and allowed for challenges on § 101 grounds to be made.[v] Although Congress purported to exclude “technological inventions” from the program, the Federal Circuit and the USPTO have closely tied the reach of the CBM program to Alice, such that CBM patents are now largely coextensive with the computerized business methods that the courts, following Alice, deem ineligible.[vi] As expected, patent claims that reach a final judgment in the CBM program are being invalidated at very high rates, especially on § 101 grounds. On top of that, the CBM program even includes two provisions that uniquely disadvantage the owners of CBM patents: (1) a narrow estoppel provision that gives petitioners broader abilities to challenge CBM patents in both the PTAB and district court;[vii] and (2) a rare right for interlocutory appeal of any decision denying a motion to stay parallel litigation—with even rarer de novo appellate review.[viii]"