InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 2974
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/23/2017

Re: None

Friday, 12/15/2017 9:43:09 AM

Friday, December 15, 2017 9:43:09 AM

Post# of 44784
Thanks for the finds n3. Would never have thought to search by first name. Guess you were unsuccessful at finding her firm. Please feel free to post your thoughts on their expertise they bring to the board as well.

As for Mark Germain, WellSford is the right one.

So D, yes I agree with your extreme bias statement, but what did I miss? My point is that the first 2 very long term board members who have been gifted nearly a million shares of the stock I invest in, bring Jack to the table. And no offence taken BTW.

One is the wife of the founder of Pluristem. That's 14 years on the board for her. The second, was a Director of a booming real estate company that was around for a few years with the last quarterly revenues of $9 million with a loss of $600 grand.

And his merger and acquisition experience of Stem Cell Innovations and Amphioxus Cell Technologies is just as stellar. They also did a PP where they raised $3.8 million. (The crowd is roaring)

Now for the last 5 years, he has been a "merchant banker" at some unknown bank for obvious reasons. A bank teller at a merchant bank could claim the same glorious statement on their resume no. Or a greeter at the door.

So far, 2 useless, long term board members of the first 2 I looked at.

Do you think these 2 board members bring any sort of positive for this cutting edge, paradigm shifting, soon to be pharma giant. Or are they just token members of past acquaintances, buddies, wife, classmates, etc. Or are they just yes votes for the twins. Sure board members are jokes for most startups. But we are not a startup this far into the game.

I've shown my research. Please enlighten me with any sort of counter points to these 2 clown. And I thought the twins resumes were pathetic. We now have quadruplets.