InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 3004
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/18/2006

Re: es1 post# 162675

Wednesday, 12/13/2017 3:49:09 PM

Wednesday, December 13, 2017 3:49:09 PM

Post# of 165854
Well, that's all well and good. You are a smarter investor than us, but this is what I was questioning.

"Let's say they just fire the lawyers and let Keevil and Currah win the suit.
They "fail" and Potts owns 51%. He sells the debt to RP for just enough money to pay the management fees for the past year.
Scott "wins" the law suit he gets millions of shares in a .0001 stock with no assets.

Meanwhile RP Capital is pleased to announce the addition of a new BOD including Dan Otto and Otto's list of "insiders".
Scott wins nothing. Shareholders are screwed. Dan and friends own the asset in a private company that doesn't report to anyone.

Great set up."

You just seem to know how to go about how to screw the shareholders. (just paraphrasing your words)