InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,247.94
(
0.25%
)
Post# of 45771
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

d4diddy

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

d4diddy

Re: None

Friday, 09/29/2006 6:51:06 PM

Friday, September 29, 2006 6:51:06 PM

Post# of 45771
They must have submitted the settlement agreement to the court today or were forced under SEC regulations to release a pre-settlement PR. Either way, don't matter much.

I'm guessing there are some angry PP investors that believed CDEX wholly owned their revolutionary technology judging from their apparent lack of interest in further investment, despite the the settlement.

This event begs the following questions:

1. If the meth gun is manufactured, will it require licensing.

2. Will this settlement effect the pending CDEX patent applications in any way?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up