InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: Crow3 post# 14716

Friday, 09/29/2006 4:21:38 PM

Friday, September 29, 2006 4:21:38 PM

Post# of 45771
Exactly Crow,

"...That did look suspicious, if one assumes that it was a open session.. Not to me, because I assumed that Griffin is smart enough to NOT have a open session."

No one said it was a bad, immoral or deceptive and as you stated, it was anticipated. Geez, some of these people act like they just got caught with their hand in the cookie jar.

It was paid advertising with a limited amount of time. The questions all had a central theme and order: Here's what we have now, here's our anticipated revenue streams and here's what we need to achieve that.

Money.

Very , very low probability that random calls could have been selected with such choreographed flow and all of the callers happening to be insiders/plaintiffs/PPer's IMO.

It is what it is, paid advertising to raise funds. That's what they need to execute their business plan and survive.

Nothing to argue about. I think it was a magnificent performance and valuable information was learned or verified.

BTW Crow, thanks for the king words. I chose to ignore it, but as Rottenapple pointed out, I think Viking executed poor judgement in allowing those posts to remain. And like you say, he ain't to high on my giveadamn list! LOL



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.