InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1018
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/27/2016

Re: None

Monday, 12/11/2017 2:00:56 PM

Monday, December 11, 2017 2:00:56 PM

Post# of 3760
Here is an excerpt from the letter from the SEC. Every shareholder should read the full letter at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1446152/000000000014014687/filename1.pdf

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, page F-2
7. We note that you filed your Form 10-K on December 13, 2013 without including an audit report for the year ended August 31, 2012, and it appears that your current auditor has referred to the report of your prior auditor in rendering an opinion on your financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2013. We also note that your financial statements for periods from inception through August 31, 2012 were audited by John Kinross-Kennedy CPA. On December 20, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC”) denied John Kinross-Kennedy CPA the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant. You can find a copy of the order at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2013/34-71154.pdf. As John Kinross-Kennedy CPA is barred from practicing before the SEC, you may not include its audit report in your filings with the Commission on or after December 20, 2013. If John Kinross-Kennedy CPA audited a year that you are required to include in your filings with the Commission, you should have a firm that is permitted to practice before the Commission as an accountant and that is registered with the PCAOB re-audit that year. Given the deficiency outlined above, you will need to consult with your current auditor, arrange to obtain an audit of the financial statements for the period from inception through August 31, 2012, and amend your Form 10-K to include an audit opinion that covers all periods presented to comply with Rule 2-05 of Regulation S-X. Please ensure that your current auditor does not express reliance on the work of your prior auditor in rendering an opinion on your financial statements.

To my knowledge they never cleared this up with the SEC. That makes all of their filings since then deficient. This is a sham that has stayed under the radar too long and I believe it caught up to them. Why else did they fail to do the pumping everyone expected? I believe they were either contacted again by the SEC or they have attorneys snooping around and are running scared and just wishing this will go away and they keep the millions of dollars they paid themselves. Time will tell.