InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 93
Posts 8868
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2014

Re: Pierretp post# 282260

Sunday, 12/10/2017 4:13:57 PM

Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:13:57 PM

Post# of 298910
Speaking for myself, I disagree on the need for anyone to read for three reasons: 1. The ruling was VACATED; 2. The Sacramento share fraud judge just ruled this document to be irrelevant to MEC's share fraud case against Maciora et al; and 3) The person who created the link is unknown.

Here is the exact quote from the Tentative Ruling published December 8.

Maciora's further request for judicial notice of a tentative ruling published in another case in this court is DENIED as irrelevant.


BTW, there is nothing new about a year old filing.

Everyone please read. This is current not old news.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.