GW, can you explain to me why the average stock IQ on that board is lower than VNDM's bid? i know that reading and comprehension is down across the boards, and if i want to engage in a real give and take dialogue i have to come to my own board and argue with myself. after all, as i stated in PM to someone, at least i know one of us is listening. but really...
what's so hard in using real data as versus posting the current pps? where charts, logs, filings, etc., all serve to offer in depth facts, a price offers a still frame snapshot that could have been photoshopped.
fact of the matter is, the universe is still living in the present pretending its the past. Faulkner wasn't wrong then but he is now when he said "the past is not dead. its not even past." sorry Bill, mach time is now mock time. and there's no more thyme to cook with. pennystock daytrading ended with the adding on of sn extra digit below the decimal point. an uptick used to be no less than .001. now you need a million shares to make $100 on a .0001 move where you used to make a thousand. the idea that daytraders will spend 1000's of dollars in an unstable environment just to get back a few hundred (if that) flies in the face of logic. when was the last time anybody posted that they spent the day trading a pennystock back and forth? or that they were trading it daily? nowadays people wait for days unto weeks to flip a stock. i'm sorry, that is not the definition of daytrading. all we see in the pink and pennies are either algol trades or position trading.
as my buddy Ian and i have postulated, you have days unto weeks unto months to buy, but only minutes unto hours unto a couple days at most to sell.
argghhhh! perhaps i prate too much. or maybe its my disgust at having posted on a board of nits!
take care
rich
AI
