InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1659
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/24/2009

Re: 80857 post# 3593

Tuesday, 12/05/2017 10:25:09 PM

Tuesday, December 05, 2017 10:25:09 PM

Post# of 7280
Well the most interesting thing here is the final settlement has been on hold, but the bankrubtcy trial as far as the creditors claims have ended. This is no doubt a landmark case and will most likely go into legal precedence. It's extremely uncommon for common shareholders to get anything after Chapter 7. But, something happened in Jan.2016 and without any public bankrubtcy documentation, we were protected. I speculate once the judge caught on to the whole story and Enersys needing to protect their interest we were saved. Enersys would have trumped anyone trying to take the technology away from them so they had time to wait and of course it would have been highly unlikely anyone would got involved in this complex mired Pandora's box. However, if you remember the Arch Boys friends were trying to get the technology but the bankrubtcy judge didn't let them get away with it and they settled. And I allege Eneresys waited until they had a chance to legally get out of this mess but failed and then sent Monbat in to save them so they would avoid negative publicity themselves. Think about this...How did Monbat acquire us and get the latest technology giving to them! Again, like I have said...why didn't Enersys just close these plants and instead of creating eastern Europe competition? So all the scenarios I have listed are on the table and I believe one of them is right. This statement is all in my opinion and is all merely speculation other then fact as all my post have been for 15 years!!