InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 69
Posts 7941
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2015

Re: shell3 post# 2808

Tuesday, 12/05/2017 2:14:28 PM

Tuesday, December 05, 2017 2:14:28 PM

Post# of 16701
Shell, IMO, I'm understanding your last two posts to be in conflict with one another.

One question • Where will Working Capital come from?

or

There's only 15M Total before Total Diluted

or

I just don't see it costing the Company anything as those that want to try this tool paying to use-it and findings or developments of this disease or that disease being the players wanting to play

or

BreathTec needs Working Capital to substain the Cash burn rate as been in the past - 95% Complete is easier on Cash burn but NEW CEO will add to that Cash Burn Rate

or

We're on the verge of Big Money Investing Here

So shareholders @ Breathtec need to lose their pants/skirt blouse/shirt to complete a device reported to be 95% complete? Also, the Acquisition Angle is one that Wong mentioned the last time we spoke. Yes, that is another way to destroy current shareholder value in the name of acquiring a junk stock. Fortunately, Nanose only cost shareholders 1,000,000 shares and over $500,000 USD, before it was junked. Good CEO's Matter!

Just 1 opinion,

/////AMG


It's A Real Movie



Take Your Best Screenshot