Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[pickered]

what is a "restored post" here? I hadn't seen this prior, perhaps that was why?

You are free to put whatever words you want in your mouth.......but don't put words in my mouth. No, that's not what I said.

I'm not trying to put any words in your mouth. I've read your posts much to date, but I tired of the lack of progress and the incessant need to trash the patents without any basis. My apologies if that frustration is showing.

You (originally) said:

I don't think vplm revealed their source codes because they're so transparent, I think they had little choice but to do so in order to fight the IPR. So the comparison to Apple doing the same is just another of a plethora of red herrings.

To which I responded:

Your position is that in a trial between Apple and VPLM where VPLM is claiming Apple is infringing, and Apple is defending itself (that it is not infringing), that Apple would be able to resist all efforts to access source code in discovery?

If so, your wrong - again.

I agree with the first sentence (rarely would people want to produce their source code unless they are open-source).

If your point was not "in a trial between Apple and VPLM where VPLM is claiming Apple is infringing, and Apple is defending itself (that it is not infringing), that Apple would be able to resist all efforts to access source code in discovery? ", then what was it?