InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 1775
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/06/2003

Re: rick85284 post# 102133

Thursday, 09/28/2006 7:21:31 PM

Thursday, September 28, 2006 7:21:31 PM

Post# of 311057
Rick perhaps not so much that as include them as I suggested for many strategic, credibility-related and financial reasons. Any long would be aware of the huge jump that 07 should show over 06 budget-wise, and if (when) SLJB is going to NAS this can only help. Also, let us not forget that the CEO stated he wanted to voluntarily show quarterlies online as reporting companies do (don't have the specifics in front of me for a quote, sorry) and I could see how they would want to have all their ducks lined up to move to higher listings quickly. Imagine what this would accomplish if released in a 1,2,3... punch manner:

1) AFs
2) New Contract 1
3) revised Q1 PFs
4) OTCBB app
5) New Contract 2
etc.

Is this worth a few more weeks? I cannot imagine that anyone who's really INVESTED in this company wouldn't day: HELL YES!

Beam me up $cotty...
Gig