InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1406
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/08/2011

Re: PlentyParanoid post# 5962

Monday, 11/27/2017 8:22:40 PM

Monday, November 27, 2017 8:22:40 PM

Post# of 7747
Thanks for the additional info, PP. You appear to have a very good understanding of oncology and pharmacology and the associated statistical data used to determine the overall effectiveness when comparing drugs used during clinical trials as does StrongBio. Me, not so much. But I get the impression based on your posts, that maybe ALDOX is not all that's it's "cracked" up be. Or is it just the SCLC trial? You're a bit vague, but seem to allude to that based on the data presented and your previous "3 Conclusions". Like Info Tech, Bio Tech is a constantly evolving field and what's cutting edge one day, can be obsolete the next. And because clinical trials involve human beings, each as unique as their fingerprints, it makes for varying and often inconclusive results.

I think we all agree that CYTR's "Science" is key to it's present and future success and survival. If your not a pharmaceutical oncologist, then you depend on those who are, and able to interpret and present their findings in a straightforward fashion. I primarily look to and trust CYTR to provide this info, but welcome others interpretations, as long as it's credible and fact based. Very serious business NO DOUBT, and a certain degree of "paranoia" is likely a healthy thing. ;p

So are you invested in CYTR's science, or not? Just curious at this point. Thanks again for your input.

GLTY & CYTR!