InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 6722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: rekcusdo post# 438448

Monday, 11/27/2017 7:48:37 PM

Monday, November 27, 2017 7:48:37 PM

Post# of 794560

I doubt you'll want this. Even if an illegal taking action were successful, courts would likely just declare money damages...and that is not something any of us post-crash holders want.



Even pre-NWS but post-2008 holders? (full disclosure: this doesn't apply to me, all my FnF holdings were bought after the NWS)

The Sixth Circuit ruling implies that a takings case would have legs. Does it also imply that no non-takings case can clear the 4617(f) bar?