InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,473.17
(
-0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,283.60
(
-0.64%
)
Dow Jones
39,134.76
(
0.77%
)
Brent Oil
84.89
(
-0.14%
)
Bitcoin
64,861.54
(
0.06%
)
Post# of 68548
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

deal guy

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 15
Posts 824
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/12/2013

deal guy

Re: DONT SQUEAL post# 45542

Tuesday, 11/14/2017 1:11:45 PM

Tuesday, November 14, 2017 1:11:45 PM

Post# of 68548
They own warrants not the underlying shares. The SC rules require constructive ownership disclosure. If the warrants were exercised and they owned the underlying shares, ECOS would have needed to disclose the exercise in their subsequent event footnote. No disclosure there.

If they did exercise the warrants and owned the shares then this 10K would be materially incorrect.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up